Why useHooks?
Created by Tyler McGinnis and the team at ui.dev, useHooks represents a modern reboot of the "utility hooks" concept. While older libraries often break in Server-Side Rendering (SSR) environments or rely on outdated patterns, useHooks is built for the Next.js and Remix era.
- Server-Safe by Default: Every hook is written to handle SSR environments gracefully, checking for
windowor DOM availability to prevent hydration mismatches. - Curated Quality: Unlike "kitchen sink" libraries that contain hundreds of unmaintained hooks, this library focuses on the most essential 30-40 utilities, keeping quality high.
- Modern Standards: Built with modern React best practices, ensuring tree-shakability and proper dependency array management.
- Interactive Documentation: The official documentation (
usehooks.com) is widely regarded as some of the best in the ecosystem, offering live, interactive examples.
Code Snippet
The useIntersectionObserver hook abstracts the complex browser API into a simple React interface, perfect for lazy loading images or triggering animations on scroll.
import * as React from "react";
import { useIntersectionObserver } from "@uidotdev/usehooks";
export default function ScrollComponent() {
const [ref, entry] = useIntersectionObserver({
threshold: 0,
root: null,
rootMargin: "0px",
});
return (
<section>
<figure ref={ref}>
{entry?.isIntersecting ? (
<img src="https://placekitten.com/800/400" alt="Lazy loaded" />
) : (
<div style={{ height: 400, background: '#f0f0f0' }}>
Loading placeholder...
</div>
)}
<figcaption>
Status: {entry?.isIntersecting ? "Visible" : "Hidden"}
</figcaption>
</figure>
</section>
);
}
This pattern removes the boilerplate of creating the observer instance, connecting it in useEffect, and cleaning it up manually.
Pros and Cons
No library is perfect; understanding the trade-offs is key to selecting the right tool.
Pros
- SSR Compatibility: One of the few utility libraries that guarantees safety in Next.js/Remix/Gatsby server environments out of the box.
- Developer Experience: Excellent TypeScript definitions and documentation make it easy to adopt.
- Tree-Shakable: You only pay for the hooks you use, keeping bundle sizes minimal.
Cons
- Limited Scope: It purposefully avoids complex business logic (like data fetching or form state), focusing only on browser/UI utilities.
- Newer Entrant: Has fewer total hooks compared to the massive (but aging)
react-uselibrary. - Dependency: While small, it introduces a runtime dependency, whereas some developers prefer copy-pasting code snippets (like
usehooks-ts).
Comparison with Other Hooks Libraries
The table below outlines the positioning differences between useHooks and other popular utility libraries:
| Library | Design Philosophy | Best For | Pain Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| useHooks | "Modern & Safe" Server-safe, essential browser utilities. | Next.js/Remix Apps Modern full-stack React applications needing reliable browser APIs. | Scope Does not include complex state or data management tools. |
| react-use | "The Kitchen Sink" Huge collection of every possible utility. | Legacy Projects Older apps where bundle size is less of a concern. | Deprecation Contains outdated patterns and is often not SSR-safe. |
| ahooks | "Enterprise Ready" Heavy focus on async state ( useRequest) and complex logic. | Complex SaaS Apps needing robust request management and advanced UI logic. | Overkill Too heavy if you just need a useLocalStorage. |
Verdict: When to Adopt
Choose useHooks if you are building a modern application (especially with Next.js or Remix) and need a reliable set of standard browser utilities (like useLocalStorage, useMediaQuery, useWindowSize) without worrying about hydration errors or abandoned code. It is the spiritual successor to react-use for the modern web.